According to this article by the New York Times, 75% of recruiters are required by their companies to do online research of candidates. Given how easy it is to Google an individual, it seems silly to not take advantage of the plethora of information available. A quick search could help confirm sneaky suspicions about an extravagant CV claim or highlight achievements that they did not get round to mentioning, but that are worth knowing about.
That being said, how truly valuable is the information that crops in your results page? How do you know that the information you have found does not belong to another individual of the same name (particularly if the investigation occurs at the screening stage)? Or that all of your candidates have been searched for in the same thorough manner and so can be evaluated against each other on a consistent basis? Furthermore, how can you ensure that personal information is used in the most appropriate way? Shockingly, 70% of recruiters in the US report that they have rejected a candidate following the information they had found online!
We want to know your thoughts – vote on our poll below and tell us your thoughts! Is it appropriate to launch a random Google search on your candidates?




